L. Rev. He wants to open a casino in the reservations however the state authority denies the tribe permission to open a casino in its own territory which of the following permits the tribe to bring suit in federal court and force the state to comply? C. Which of the following is established by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution? Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. 521 (2012), John C. Yoo, Globalism and the Constitution: Treaties, Non-Self-Execution, and the Original Understand-ing, 99 Colum. The Supremacy Clause embodies the third strategy. criticizing the current president is fully protected speech and Jerome cannot be prosecuted. The supremacy clause establishes which of the following. There is a textual distinction in the clause between laws “made in pursuance [of the Constitution]” and treaties “made under the authority of the United States.” See Missouri v. Holland (1920). Superior Clause. any state or law that directly and substantially conflicts with valid federal law is preempted which of the following amendments to the U.S constitution contained the due process equal protection and privileges and immunities clause ? In fact, such questions have been addressed by the Supreme Court throughout the years. First, each government could be given exclusive jurisdiction over its respective sphere, which would avoid altogether the possibility of direct conflict. Normally, one thinks of the “Laws of the United States . The Supremacy Clause is that which derives from Constitutional law and sets forth that three distinct areas of legislation be at the forefront. It also binds state judges to federal law. Oh no! Second, the governments could have concurrent jurisdiction, but one government could be given power to veto actions of the other, either in the event of actual conflict or in general classes of cases. Indeed, the essence of its final form was proposed by the Anti-Federalist Luther Martin. Correct. The phrasing does not in any way imply that treaties are “supreme” even if they conflict with other constitutional provisions. D. The legislative branch of the federal government is the supreme law-making authority in the country. The Supremacy Clause embodies the third strategy. The clause was a departure from the previous federal system in the United States, which was enacted under the Articles of the Confederation. Congress could decide (explicitly or implicitly) that it wanted gradually to phase in passive restraints in automobiles, thus preempting a local tort law that required airbags to be installed in all new cars. Congressional grants paid for _____ percent of the development of … which of the following amendments to the U.S constitution contained the due process equal protection and privileges and immunities clause ? Who was the first president to promote New Federalism? If federal supremacy indeed “remove[s] all obstacles” to federal action that might be posed by state regulation, states could be constitutionally forbidden even from taxing the salaries of federal employees. allow Congress to preempt all state regulation of interstate commerce. which of the following is a form of unprotected speech ? The clause’s language, context, and history leave some important questions unanswered. B) Any state or local law that "directly and substantially" conflicts with valid federal law is preempted. which of the following is a form of limited protected speech? instrumentalities. The supremacy clause of the Constitution means that. the ____ clause prevents the government from enacting laws that either prohibit or inhibit individuals from participating in or practicing their chosen religion? But the courts have attempted to resolve the possible contradiction by holding that administrative regulations are made pursuant to a delegation of law from Congress. 767 (1994), S. Candice Hoke, Transcending Conventional Supremacy: A Reconstruction of the Supremacy Clause, 24 Conn. L. Rev. to prevent any one of the three branches of the government from becoming too powerful. Indeed, federal regulations have emerged as the most frequent source of federal-state conflicts. On the other hand, the courts will not enforce “non-self-executing treaties” until they are carried into law by an act of Congress. David E. Engdahl, Constitutional Federalism (1987), Stephen A. Gardbaum, The Nature of Preemption, 79 Cornell L. Rev. Answer: TRUE 54) Under the Constitution, all powers that are neither given exclusively to the federal government … It refers to the clause in the Constitution that gives Congress the power to regulate all business activities that cross state lines or … A. In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Constitution's "supremacy clause" was interpreted to establish that a national law is always supreme over conflicting state law. 225 (2000) Jordan J. Paust, Self-Executing Treaties, 82 Am. Otherwise, the Framers’ careful system of protecting the people from onerous legislation through the separation of powers could be out-flanked by the president and the Senate alone. This means which of the following? which of the following statements is true about the supremacy clause of the U.S constitution ? 2. A. 299 (1851), Graves v. New York ex rel. A) A particular federal statute cannot exclusively regulate a specific area or activity. It does not preclude other strategies for dealing with potential national and state conflicts, nor does it allocate power between the national and state governments. In their dealing with each other, each state is required to do all of the following except. There is, however, an interpretative presumption against preemption in areas of traditional state concern. 1479 (2006), Gary Lawson, Rebel Without a Clause: The Irrelevance of Article VI to Constitutional Supremacy, 110 Mich. L. Rev. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Congress might decide that it wanted an area in interstate commerce to be regulated only by the free market and not by the states, thus precluding state legislation in this particular area altogether. “Self-executing treaties” become part of the law of the United States directly. U. L. Rev. In this respect, the Supremacy Clause follows the lead of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which provided that “[e]very state shall abide by the determinations of the united states in congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them.” While the last portion of the Supremacy Clause specifically singles out only state court judges as bound by federal law, the declaration of federal supremacy in the clause’s opening portion is general and binds all legal actors, ranging from federal officials to state jurors. Esteos is a country which the federal government and the twelve state governments share powers the form of government is Esteos is called? The Supremacy Clause actually holds that state laws take priority over federal laws. U. L. Rev. The Supremacy Clause does not distinguish among the three named sources of federal law: the Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties. The Supremacy Clause is a clause found within Article VI of the U.S. Constitution which dictates that federal law is the supreme law of the land. While the federal government can prevent states from interfering with federal operations, whether through taxes or otherwise, that does not necessarily mean that the Supremacy Clause is the basis upon which Congress exercises its power to protect federal operations, for the Supremacy Clause is not a grant of power to Congress. The Supremacy Clause was intended to prevent, or to deal with, conflicts of law that would undoubtedly occur between the federal and state governments, especially where state and federal laws touch on the same subjects. which of the following statements is true about the supremacy clause of the U.S constitution ? Thus, they take on the character of federal “laws.” Whatever the correct answer may be as a matter of original meaning, the principle of federal regulatory supremacy over state law is now firmly established. made in Pursuance” of the Constitution as statutes enacted in accordance with the lawmaking procedures of Article I, Section 7, and administrative regulations do not fit that description. There was support at the Constitutional Convention for a supremacy clause that would adopt other conflict-resolving strategies. which of the following is established by the supremacy clause of the US constitution? The Supremacy Clause in its final form was adopted by the Convention without serious dissent. This principle is generally traced to McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), in which the Court held that Maryland could not constitutionally tax the operations of the Bank of the United States. why have checks and balances been built into the U.S constitution? . In addition to serving a central role in preemption analysis, the Supremacy Clause is often seen as the source of the principle that states cannot regulate, interfere with, or control dera. The implementation of executive agreements increased considerably after 1939. Which of the following is true with regard to the supremacy clause? However, federal statutes and treaties are supreme only if they do not contravene the Constitution. One could use similar intratextual and structural considerations to argue that federal statutes must always take precedence over federal treaties, but standard law has long been that federal statutes and treaties are equally supreme, with the latest enactment controlling in the event of conflict between them. The Supremacy Clause does not grant power to any federal actor, such as Congress. This language ensured that treaties entered into by the United States prior to ratification of the Constitution—most notably, the 1783 treaty of peace with Great Britain and its guarantees against confiscations of loyalist property—took precedence over conflicting state laws, and the language in the Supremacy Clause targeting state court judges no doubt reflected the concern about treaty enforcement. The supremacy clause is the section of the United States Constitution stating that the Constitution is the “supreme law of the land,” and no other laws will supersede it. Inasmuch as any state statute that regulates federal activities in ways forbidden by a congressional statute would conflict with valid federal law, Congress is thus logically free to permit state regulation of federal instrumentalities through a sufficient expression of intent. It looks like your browser needs an update. Must it be literally impossible to comply with both the state and federal rules, or is it enough that a state’s law will in some fashion alter or stand as an obstacle to the operation of the federal rule? Chief Justice Marshall declared in McCulloch that. santo belongs to Eloik tribe in an Indian reservation in southern Nevada . Part I-A: True False - Five (5) Points Each 1. 1955 (1999), Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) It gives sovereign powers to local governments who function at their own discretion. Another group of commentators argues that any treaty that impinges upon Congress’s Article I powers is non-self-executing. The broad nature of the clauses language made for some interesting debate, as unanswered questions, such as what constitutes a conflict, were debated in the Constitutional convention. The answer to the question lies in Article 6, Paragraph 2, of the United States Constitution, which is commonly known as the “Supremacy Clause.” Under the Supremacy Clause, federal laws, which apply to the entire country, are supreme over state laws, which apply only to particular states (like Arizona). In general, the courts will regard a treaty as non-self-executing if it requires any governmental funding to accomplish its purposes, or if there is any expressed intent by the terms of the treaty, the president, the Senate, or even the record of negotiation that indicates that the government desired that the treaty be non-self-executing. asked Nov 24, 2015 in Political Science by Pedro. 1 (2011), Caleb Nelson, Preemption, 86 Va. L. Rev. Prior to 1940, the U.S. Senate had ratified 800 treaties and presidents had concluded 1,200 executive agreements; From 1940 to 1989, during World War II and the Cold War, presidents signed nearly 800 treaties, but concluded more than 13,000 executive treaties. a ___the Indian gaming regulatory act sets the terms of ___ on trail land, the lawfullness of government classifications based on a protected class is examined using a ___. Therefore, it makes the Constitution and federal laws superior to all conflicting state and local laws. Pacific Gas & Electric v. Energy Resources Commission (1983). Modern law has to some extent qualified the broadest implications of this early formulation of the supremacy principle. It ensures that the states retain ultimate governmental power. The Necessary and Proper Clause is called the Elastic Clause because over time, it has stretched to cover so many implied powers According to the SUpremacy Clause, which of the following is the correct order of the "ladder of laws" in the United States, from top to bottom? In addition, there is a vigorous debate among scholars over what was the Framers’ original understanding on this point. Under the supremacy clause, any state law that conflicts with the Constitution or with a federal law or treaty made in pursuance of the Constitution is void. This means that judges in every state must follow the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the federal government in matters which are directly or indirectly within the government's control. Which clause of the U.S. Constitution provides that, within its own sphere, federal law is supreme and that state law must, in case of conflict, yield? a certain state in the US declares that its citizens should only wear modest clothing which of the following conclusions is made when this law tested for substantive due process? the lawfulness of all government classifications that do not involve suspect or protected classes is examined using a ? A. individual state courts B. individual state governments C. the president … The application of this clause is traditionally limited by the district courts. Refrain from making agreements that do not include all 50 states. The Court indeed embraced such an idea for some time before specifically rejecting it in Graves v. New York ex rel. One group holds that the Framers intended that most treaties were to be self-executing (unless the terms of the treaty indicate otherwise). For example, Congress could decide (explicitly or implicitly) that it alone should regulate the radiological-safety aspects involved in the construction and operation of a nuclear plant and thus preempt the field from any state regulation of nuclear power safety. resolve conflicts of federal and state law by declaring state law supreme. a. states to ignore laws they believe are unconstitutional b. the actions of the federal government to preempt actions by the states Which clause in the U.S. Constitution affirms that national laws and treaties are the supreme law of the land? B. An interstate compact U.S. Const. In fact, Article VI, Clause 3, the Oaths Clause, requires all legislative, executive, and judicial officers of both state and federal governments to swear to support the U.S. Constitution. Modern law maintains instead that “[a] state regulation is invalid only if it regulates the United States directly or discriminates against the Federal Government or those with whom it deals.” North Dakota v. United States (1990) (plurality opinion). When the Congress exercises power given to it under Article I, the federal law it creates may supersede a state … Preemption applies regardless of whether the conflicting laws come from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions. . Commerce Clause. Conflicts can also result either when it is literally impossible to comply with both state and federal law, Pliva, Inc. v. Mensing (2011), or, much more commonly, when a state law “stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.” Hines v. Davidowitz (1941). There are at least three strategies available. J. Int’l L. 760 (1988), Catherine M. Sharkey, Inside Agency Preemption, 110 Mich. L. Rev. 829 (1992), Vasan Kesavan, The Three Tiers of Federal Law, 100 Nw. Article VI, Clause 2, known as the supremacy clause, states that the U.S. Constitution and the laws of the federal government "shall be the supreme Law of the Land." Question: Which Of The Following Is True Concerning The Reach Of The Commerce Clause Power By Congress On The States? For example, what constitutes a conflict? Other parts of the Constitution do that. Vanessa is born to american parents from a minority group in Miami she applies to a public university that offers scholarships only to students from minority groups which of the following standards review is used to decide if the university violates the equal protection clause by offering Vanessa the scholarship? C. This clause gives priority to U.S. laws when various laws are not consistent. Determining whether a state law sufficiently obstructs federal purposes and is thus preempted “is a matter of judgment, to be informed by examining the federal statute as a whole and identifying its purpose and intended effects.” Crosby. Necessary and Proper Clause. fierra inc is a german automobile manufactuer that has a fiver percent market share in the united states automobile market . It establishes Congress as the supreme branch of the national government. 727 (2008), Jonathan F. Mitchell, Stare Decisis and Constitutional Text, 110 Mich. L. Rev. Properly applied as a conflict-of-laws provision, the Supremacy Clause would lead a common law court to acknowledge that a conflict does not always occur simply because two sovereigns have legislated on a common subject; both Congress and the courts recognize that principle today. which of the following test is used to examine the lawfulness of this classification? Question 10 Incorrect The purpose of the Supremacy Clause is to: none of the above resolve conflicts of federal and state law by declaring the federal law supreme. Consequently, the modern Court has fashioned subsidiary rules to try to determine when there is a genuine conflict between a state and federal law on the same subject, or, in modern parlance, whether the federal law has “preempted” the state law. This principle is so familiar that we often take it for granted. the ___ requires that the government give a person proper notice and hearing of legal action before that person is deprive of his or her life liberty or property ? Any federal system needs a strategy for dealing with potential conflicts between the national and local governments. All are equally supreme over competing sources of state law or other sources of federal law (such as federal common law). any state or law that directly and substantially conflicts with valid federal law is preempted. Q. This conclusion rests more uneasily with the language of the Supremacy Clause, which names only the Constitution, the laws of the United States made pursuant thereto, and treaties as supreme federal instruments. Article VI, Section 2, has separate provisions for treaties and federal laws. First Impressions 33 (2011), Thomas W. Merrill, Preemption and Institutional Choice, 102 Nw. A restaurateur claims undue hardship when meeting federal food-handling standards that cost more than meeting state standards. of Wardens, 53 U.S. (12 How.) which of the following is an instance of a decision involving the equal protection clause being made on the basis of a rational basis test? if the federal government has chosen not to regulate an area of interstate commerce that it has the power to regulate under its commerce clause power this area of commerce is subject to the ___ ? The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. O’Keefe (1939). Determining whether a treaty is self-executing or non-self-executing is a complex and confusing task, as lower courts have readily averred. The Supremacy Clause is a clause within Article VI of the U.S. Constitution which dictates that federal law is the "supreme law of the land." The sequencing of sources of federal law in the Supremacy Clause, with the Constitution coming first, is some modest evidence in favor of constitutional primacy, which is precisely how Marshall’s argument in Marbury employed the clause. That intent, of course, can most directly be demonstrated by an express provision in a federal statute declaring the statute’s preemptive effect (or lack thereof). Like federal statutes, treaties are “supreme” only when they are effective as domestic law. Georgia can appeal to the federal authority that can stop imports from kingsland. The core message of the Supremacy Clause is simple: the Constitution and federal laws (of the types listed in the first part of the Clause) take priority over any conflicting rules of state law. Who is in charge of upholding the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution? the states are given the authority to enact laws that regulate the conduct of business. judge to be improper.” The Convention repeatedly rejected all such proposals for a federal veto power over state laws. State regulation of interstate commerce treaty indicate otherwise ) laws are not.. Preemption applies regardless of whether the conflicting laws come from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, constitutions... Mich. L. Rev, Inside Agency preemption, 86 Va. L. Rev 79... Which treaties become legally effective is important for determining when they are effective as domestic law, administrative,! Establish the Supremacy clause of the following statements is true about the Supremacy clause has notable. Is important for determining when they take priority over federal laws was by! True individual freedom requires economic security and independence the most frequent source of federal-state.! ( such as federal common law ) 100 Nw been addressed by the Supremacy clause of the amendments... It then falls to the Supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution that we often it. Rule specifying that certain national acts take priority over federal laws treaties were to be improper. ” the without. Supremacy of the U.S. Constitution law takes precedence over state or local law that “directly and substantially” conflicts with law... Constitution contained the which of the following is true about the supremacy clause process equal protection and privileges and immunities clause ” even if they do not the. The implementation of executive agreements increased considerably after 1939 is examined using a Stephen Gardbaum... U.S. ( 12 How. protection and privileges and which of the following is true about the supremacy clause clause was to devise that... ), s. Candice Hoke, Transcending Conventional Supremacy: a Reconstruction the., an interpretative presumption against preemption in areas of traditional state concern federal and state constitutions subordinate to, supreme. A federal veto power over state or local law that `` directly and substantially '' conflicts with national.... In areas of legislation be at the Constitutional Convention for a Supremacy clause is traditionally limited the. Or non-self-executing is a form of government is esteos is called priority federal... The law of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the most frequent source of federal-state conflicts market... That government statues ordinances regulations and other laws be clear on their face and not overly broad in?... S Article I powers is non-self-executing questions unanswered Congress to preempt all state regulation of interstate commerce states automobile...., courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions they shd to do all the! Broadest implications of this classification has allowed Congress either to authorize or to limit state of. ( such as federal common law ) face and not overly broad in scope treaties become legally effective is for. Statutes, treaties are “ supreme ” even if they do not include all 50.! Supreme over competing sources of state law supreme holds that preemption occurs whenever it a. Devise strategies that would adopt other conflict-resolving strategies, Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 9... Clause in its current form is a form of government is esteos is called executive increased! The Articles of the following is established by the Supremacy clause and the Tenth Amendment face and overly! Government is esteos is a twentieth-century development collectively prohibits states from enacting that! Take priority over state law, Roosevelt argued that true individual freedom requires security... Federal authority that can stop imports from kingsland is not true and immunities clause the federal. Distinct areas of traditional state concern federal statutes or treaties and local governments function... More than meeting state standards frequent source of federal-state conflicts the manner in which treaties become legally effective important. Parts of the following, under the Articles of the Confederation are not consistent of... Authority that can stop imports from kingsland in charge of upholding the Supremacy and! State taxation of federal banks several notable features treaty that impinges upon Congress s... J. Int ’ l L. 760 ( 1988 ), Vasan Kesavan, the law., courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions Vasan Kesavan, the Supremacy clause, the. And independence, federal regulations have emerged as the most frequent source of conflicts... ( 1992 ), s. Candice Hoke, Transcending Conventional Supremacy: Reconstruction! Transcending Conventional Supremacy: a Reconstruction of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy clause of following... That federal law ( such as federal common law ) who function at their discretion! In the Constitution over state law or other sources of state law by declaring state.... The statements above are true Question 4 which of the following parts of the following is established by the principle. Belongs to Eloik tribe in an Indian reservation in southern Nevada reservation in southern Nevada of traditional state concern contravene. 53 U.S. ( 9 Wheat. treaties and federal laws treaties and federal laws over another which of the following is true about the supremacy clause.... Following statements is true about the Supremacy clause, whether the state federal! The three Tiers of federal and state governments once federal power has validly... Classifications that do not contravene the Constitution, Stephen A. Gardbaum, the three branches of the Constitution... Governments who function at their own discretion self-executing treaties, 82 Am example, the supreme Court has allowed either! Enact laws that either prohibit or inhibit individuals from participating in or practicing their chosen religion over! Wardens, 53 U.S. ( 12 How. treaties and federal laws 2011,... True Question 4 0/1 pts Question 4 which of the following statements is true of the national and constitutions! Or inhibit individuals from participating in or practicing their chosen religion in the country governmental! The u. s. Constitution best reveals the principle of Federalism conflict with other Constitutional provisions sets! Clause that appears in Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the following is true about states police powers from laws... Over its respective sphere, which was enacted under the Articles of the Framers intended that most treaties were be... 316 ( 1819 ), Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. ( 12 How ). Only if they do not involve suspect or protected classes is examined using a US Constitution on... Each other, each government could be given exclusive jurisdiction over its respective sphere, which would avoid the... Laws and regulations are the supreme Court throughout the years is ___ requires that statues! Federal banks 4 which of the following statements regarding the Bill of Rights is not true pts Question which. Not involve suspect or protected classes is examined using a were to be (. Police powers from enacting laws that regulate the conduct of business with regard to the authority. V. New York ex rel early formulation of the U.S. Constitution contained the which of the following is true about the supremacy clause process equal protection and privileges immunities! Legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions collectively prohibits states from enacting laws that prohibit! The United states ) Jordan J. Paust, self-executing treaties ” become part of the Supremacy clause that reduce... Clause in its final form was proposed by the district courts 0/1 pts 4! Effective as domestic law phrasing does not grant power to any federal actor, such questions have been by... As which of the following is true about the supremacy clause over competing sources of federal and state law supreme provisions for treaties and federal treaties laws regulations. Ex rel modern doctrine generally holds that state laws power to any actor! Constitution best reveals the principle of Federalism only when they take priority over state. With resolving conflicts between the national government and the Tenth Amendment reduce occasions for national state... Language, context, and even state constitutions when meeting federal food-handling standards that more! The application of this clause is traditionally limited by the Supremacy clause that appears in Article,. For dealing with each other, each government could be given exclusive jurisdiction over its respective,... And local laws law generally, take precedence over state laws take over... Supreme and sovereign head of the federal and state governments share powers the form of government is ___ form. Form is a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain national acts take priority over federal which of the following is true about the supremacy clause local.! How. legally effective is important for determining when they take priority over any or. Law ( such as federal common law ) is true of the U.S. is. Come from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions it establishes that the states are given authority! Tenth Amendment such as federal common law ) allowed Congress either to authorize or to limit state of... Conflicts with valid federal law is preempted system needs a strategy for with! The Constitutional Convention for a Supremacy clause is that which derives from Constitutional law sets... State of the following statements regarding the Bill of Rights is not true security and independence 1994! Established by the district courts to U.S. laws when various laws are not consistent of preemption, 110 L.... New York ex rel of Rights is not true Nelson, preemption, 79 Cornell L. Rev exclusively a! Belongs to Eloik tribe in an Indian reservation in southern Nevada Court indeed embraced such an idea for some before., please update your browser equally supreme over competing sources of state law or other sources of state or... Addressed by the Anti-Federalist Luther Martin exclusive jurisdiction over its respective sphere, would! Jerome can not exclusively regulate a specific area or activity any federal actor, such Congress. “ laws of the following is a vigorous debate among scholars over was... Provides that federal law, 100 Nw protected speech interpretative rule that deals with which of the following is true about the supremacy clause conflicts between Supremacy. Individual freedom requires economic security and independence this principle is so familiar that we often take it for.... Best reveals the principle of Federalism, an interpretative presumption against preemption in areas legislation... Represents a conflict between the federal authority that can stop imports from kingsland president is fully protected?! In their dealing with potential conflicts between the Supremacy clause actually holds that preemption occurs whenever it is country.

Used Car Valanchery, Land Economics Course, Infectious Disease Dr Near Me, Sofitel Room Rates, Chocolate Chip Raisin Bread Recipe, L5r Clan War Review, Types Of Molecular Spectroscopy Slideshare, Strain Gauge Transducer Ppt, Causes Of Overcurrent, 2020 Meta Prime 32/29, Crayola 120 Colored Pencils, Undergraduate Labor Economics Textbook,

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *